Rear Facing vs Forward Facing Car Seats

Rear facing vs forward facing car seats (and how that includes the RideSafer Travel Vest) when we apply the 5 safety principles of every restraint system.

There are 5 principles every restraint system applies whether that is a seat belt or a child restraint system, aka car seat, talked about in the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s Child Passenger Safety Technicians certification program. These are principles you need to be aware of when deciding between rear-facing or forward-facing car seats for your child.

Those principles are:

  1. Keep occupants inside the vehicle. When a person is thrown from a vehicle the potential for injury increases drastically.
  2. Contact the strongest points of the body.
  3. Spread the crash force out of as much of the body surface area as possible.
  4. Ride down the crash, which means to spread the crash energy out over more time for instance by the seat belts giving and stretching some during a crash
  5. Protect the head, neck and spinal column — the parts of the human body that are really hard to repair once they are damaged.

As you can imagine forward impacts are the most common type of impact. Another little factoid is that most crashes, like 97 percent, are 30mph or less.

Frontal crashes: rear facing versus forward facing car seats

When we’re talking about frontal crashes, we’re talking about the child being rear facing for the at least their first two years. Now they are making child restraints that go to much higher rear-facing weight limits, and that’s a good thing because if you think about that forward impact, we have the child’s head, neck and back all being supported by the child restraint.

When we flip that child forward facing, the principle is that we’re using the harness to restrain the child’s body as that forward impact occurs. Ideally we’re going to be using the tether anchor system and the child restraint will be properly installed according to car seat manufacturer’s instructions.

From a crash dynamics perspective, we’re looking at the harness contacting the shoulders and hips with the crotch buckle in the middle, that’s the “contacting the strongest points and spreading the crash force out over as much of the body as possible”.

The down side of forward facing or the reason that it’s one step away from optimum protection, which is rear facing, is that now we’re restraining the child’s body but there’s nothing about the child restraint system that’s necessarily restraining their head or their neck in that forward impact.

That’s why the rear-facing recommendation is to keep your child rear-facing as long as possible. We want to give the bones in the neck as much time as possible to get as strong as possible so that it is able and has the best chances of the neck being able to restrain the head and protect the spinal column in that forward impact when that child is forward facing.

(Once a child is turned forward facing, the harness is restraining the child in a crash and the head flies forward. At this age the vertebrae are not calcified (strong) enough to hold the ligaments between them and the ligaments can pull out of the vertebrae. The force of the head stretching the spinal cord as little as 1/4 of an inch causes injury up to and including full separation from the brain stem, also known as internal decapitation.)

Frontal impacts: Seat belt positioning device

RideSafer Travel Vest safe booster seat alternativeNow if we think about the next stage after the 5-point harness is the seat belt positioning stage. That is the stage where most commonly people are familiar with the booster seat but that’s also where the RideSafer Travel Vest comes into play as a seat belt positioning device. At that point what we’re doing is positioning the adult seat belt on a child.

A booster works by lifting the child up so the adult seat belt will accommodate them better. The RideSafer vest does essentially the same thing but by bringing the seat belt down to the child and locking it in place on the shoulder and hips with the clips that are part of the vest.

The other component of the vest that we really like is that the front panels of the vest are designed to absorb and dissipate the crash energy of the vehicle seat belt doing the work of restraining the child. That again is applying that principle of spreading the crash course out over as much of the body is possible.

With the clip on the shoulder of the RideSafer vest, we’re able to keep that shoulder belt properly positioned on the child. Even if they move around some, that seat belt is going to track with them.

Optimum protection

Rear facing is optimum protection. When forward facing — whether with a harness, a booster seat or the RideSafer vest — the mechanics of the head neck and spinal column are virtually the same in that forward impact because it’s the head and the neck that are unrestrained and moving forward.

Once we move beyond the RideSafer vest or booster, a child goes into just the vehicle seat belt system. Part of that process is determining when your child can move to that step with 5-step seat belt fit test, which is covered in one of our other videos.

I do want to mention at Safe Ride 4 kids, we have the Tummy Shield, which introduces seat belt safety for the pregnant mother. That’s important because this vehicle’s seat belt system was never intended for pregnant moms. The Tummy Shield does a great job of applying these same principles of keeping the occupant in the car, contacting the strongest points of the body, spreading the crash forces out and doing everything that we can to help the mother ride down the crash without impacting the unborn child.

We want to know, how long are you keeping your child rear facing? Share your comments below.

By Greg Durocher, CEO at Safe Ride 4 Kids and certified CPS Technician Instructor since 2002

Copyright 2016 Safe Ride 4 Kids. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

Save

« « — — » »
3 Comments
  • Jason Senekkis
    Posted at 22:53h, 28 July Reply

    Our son is 2.5 years old. He is still facing backwards and he will be until his car seat height limits allow that no matter the age. The height limit is 105cm (42inches). My wife is always sitting with him in the back seats whenever I drive and he is really happy looking around while traveling. 90% of children in Cyprus are not restrained correctly in Cyprus (badly installed car seats, no car seat/booster seat or seat belt at all, riding in the front seat, standing in the car etc). We are doing the right thing even though the law says nothing about rear facing and we are sharing our experience to change how things are done here.

  • Julia Bartens
    Posted at 09:54h, 18 September Reply

    I’m a little confused. I understand that frontal crashes, and conversely being rear-ended, are the most common accidents. I also understand that a rear-facing car seat is the safest when one has a frontal accident as the head is being pushed into the seat at impact. But it seems that rear accidents are even more likely and wouldn’t a forward facing seat be then the safest for the same reason? Thank you!!

    • Greg Durocher
      Posted at 13:54h, 18 September Reply

      Hey there Julia, You are correct that when a vehicle is rear-ended the “rear facing” child would experience the initial crash forces as a “forward” impact and the resulting injury pattern may present itself if the speeds involved rose to the injury threshold but there are other factors involved as well. One of those is the way that rear facing seats typically perform or move in a “rear end” crash or the “rebound” phase of a forward impact. It is very different than the way a forward facing seat performs in a forward impact… and typically, by default there is a limit to how far the head can be thrust because, again, depending on the seat being used, the vehicle seat back might create a “cocooning” action with the shell of the rear-facing seat vs allowing unrestricted stretching of the neck/spine in a forward facing position in the more common frontal crash..

      Then from a statistical probability perspective, it is not an accurate leap to assume that all forward impacts involve a converse rear impact. People run into a lot of things that are not the backs of other cars and that is why the forward impact is the most common type of crash.

      I hope this helps clear up the confusion. Please let us know if you need more help clearing it up…

Post A Comment